Square Root Calculator
Square, cube and nth roots with simplified radical form.
Raise any base to any power, including negative exponents that give reciprocals and fractional ones that give roots, with scientific notation for results that outgrow ordinary digits.
About precision. Results are computed in double-precision floating point, which is exact for whole numbers up to about sixteen digits and very slightly approximate beyond that. Figures are rounded for display, so a long chain of calculations can differ from a hand-worked answer in the last decimal place. Where an exact fraction or radical exists, this page shows it alongside the decimal.
An exponent is repeated multiplication when it is a positive whole number, and something less obvious when it is not. This calculator handles all three cases and explains what a negative or fractional exponent actually means rather than just returning a number.
Fractional exponents are how roots are actually defined. The square root of a number is that number to the power of 0.5, and 81 to the power of 0.25 is the fourth root, which is 3.
One operation with three faces, and a handful of rules that all follow from one.
| Symbol | Meaning | Unit | Typical range |
|---|---|---|---|
b | The base being raised | any | −1e12 – 1e12 |
n | The exponent | any | −1,000 – 1,000 |
Result | b to the power of n | — | — |
Reciprocal | 1 ÷ result, or b to the power −n | — | — |
Digits | Length of the whole-number part | count | — |
Zero to the power of zero has no agreed value under most conventions, and returns 1 in most software, including this page. The disagreement is genuine rather than a bug: the limit approaches 1 from some directions and 0 from others, so mathematicians define it contextually and programmers pick the more useful default.
7 to the power of −3 is 1 ÷ 7³ = 1 ÷ 343 = 0.0029154519. That is small enough that scientific notation takes over: 2.915452 × 10−3. Going the other way, 81 to the power of 0.25 is the fourth root of 81, which is exactly 3 — because 3 × 3 × 3 × 3 = 81. And 810.75 is the fourth root cubed, which is 27.
Money growing at 7% a year is multiplied by 1.07 each year, so after thirty years it is 1.0730 = 7.612255 times the original. That single calculation is the whole of compound interest, and it is why the compound interest calculator and this page are doing the same arithmetic with different labels. At that rate money doubles every 10.24 years, which is ln(2) ÷ ln(1.07).
The same base at exponents either side of seven.
| Exponent | Result | Scientific | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 97.65625 | — | |
| 6 | 244.140625 | — | |
| 7 | 610.3515625 | — | Your exponent |
| 8 | 1,525.87890625 | — | |
| 9 | 3,814.697265625 | — |
Each step multiplies by the base, which is what makes exponential growth so unlike the linear kind. Going from exponent 5 to 9 does not add four times something — it multiplies by 2.5 four times over, turning 97.66 into 3,814.70.
That is also why exponential figures are so hard to judge by eye. Two to the power of 64 is about 1.84 × 1019, a number with twenty digits, reached from a base of two in sixty-four steps. The famous story about doubling grains of rice on a chessboard is not an exaggeration; it is this calculation, and the total is roughly a thousand times the world's annual rice production.
Scientific notation exists precisely because ordinary digits stop being readable. Writing 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 communicates nothing that 1.844674 × 1019 does not, and the second form makes the order of magnitude — the number of digits — immediately visible, which is usually the part that matters.
Four rules that follow from the exponent laws and are worth having to hand.
Anything to the power of zero is one. Not by decree, but because bn ÷ bn is both 1 and bn−n = b0. The convention is forced by consistency with the subtraction rule.
A negative base needs a whole exponent. (−8)1/3 is −2 and perfectly sensible, but (−8)1/2 asks for the square root of a negative number and has no real answer. This calculator refuses the fractional case rather than returning something misleading.
Very large results lose exactness. Beyond about sixteen digits, double-precision arithmetic can no longer represent every whole number, so 2^64 is stored as the nearest representable value rather than exactly. For most purposes that is invisible; for cryptography or exact integer work it is not.
Growth rates are exponents in disguise. Any repeated percentage change is a power: growing 7% a year for n years is 1.07n, and the CAGR calculator solves the same equation for the rate instead of the result. Recognising that saves working out compound problems from first principles every time.
Exponential growth is worth one more paragraph, because the human failure to feel it is remarkably consistent. Asked to guess where a quantity doubling repeatedly will end up, most people underestimate by orders of magnitude — not by a bit. Folding a sheet of paper forty-two times would, in principle, reach the moon: 2⁴² times a tenth of a millimetre is about 440,000 kilometres. The arithmetic is trivial and the result is genuinely difficult to believe, which is the whole problem.
The practical version of that lesson is the rule of seventy-two: a quantity growing at r per cent doubles in roughly 72 ÷ r periods. At 7% that gives 10.3, against the exact 10.24 — close enough for mental arithmetic and a useful check on anything a spreadsheet tells you about compounding.
For roots specifically — including simplified radical form and the perfect-square check — the square root calculator covers the fractional-exponent case in more detail, and the scientific calculator will evaluate powers inside a longer expression.
Multiply the base by itself as many times as the exponent says. 2.5 to the power of 7 is 2.5 multiplied by itself seven times, which is exactly 610.3515625.
A reciprocal. 7 to the power of −3 is 1 ÷ 7³ = 1 ÷ 343 = 0.0029154519. The sign flips the result to the other side of one.
A root. Raising to the power of 0.5 is a square root, and 81 to the power of 0.25 is the fourth root, which is exactly 3.
Because bn ÷ bn equals both 1 and b0. The convention is forced by consistency with the rule that dividing subtracts exponents.
Not to an even root. (−8)1/3 is −2 and fine; (−8)1/2 asks for the square root of a negative number and has no real answer.
Undefined by most mathematical conventions and returned as 1 by most software, including this page. The limit approaches 1 from some directions and 0 from others, so the disagreement is real.
At or above a billion, or below a ten-thousandth. Beyond those points ordinary digits stop communicating the order of magnitude, which is usually the part that matters.
They are the same calculation. Money growing 7% a year for thirty years is 1.07³⁰ = 7.612255 times the original, and doubling takes ln(2) ÷ ln(1.07) = 10.24 years.
Because double-precision arithmetic runs out of exact whole numbers at about sixteen digits. 2^64 is stored as the nearest representable value rather than exactly.
512 and 64. Powers associate to the right, so the first means 2^(3^2) = 2^9. Brackets are the only reliable way to say which you mean.
Six tools that pick up where this one leaves off.
Square, cube and nth roots with simplified radical form.
MathTrigonometry, logs, powers and factorials, parsed safely without eval.
MathThree percentage questions in one tool, with the working shown.
MathAdd, subtract, multiply and divide fractions with automatic simplification.
MathSee what interest earning interest turns your balance into over time.
FinanceSmooth a lumpy multi-year result into one annual growth rate.
FinanceCookies. We use cookies for site functionality and to serve ads via Google AdSense. Nothing you type into a calculator is ever stored or sent anywhere. Read our Cookie Policy.