Future Value Calculator

Project what a lump sum, a stream of payments, or both together will be worth at a chosen date and rate of return — with the split between the money you put in and the growth on top.

Updated August 2026 Finance & Personal Money

Enter today's amount and the payments

Payment timing
Currency
Future value
From the lump sum
From the payments
Growth on top of what you paid
The other timing convention

Estimates only. The result depends entirely on the assumptions you enter. Rates, fees and tax rules vary by lender and by country, and none of this is financial, tax or investment advice. Confirm figures with a qualified adviser or the institution before you commit to anything.

How to Use the Future Value Calculator

Future value answers the question every long-range money decision rests on: what will this be worth later? It handles three cases at once — a lump sum on its own, a stream of payments on its own, or both together.

  1. Enter the amount you have today. Set it to zero if you are starting from nothing and only making regular payments. The tool will then show the future value of the payment stream alone, which is the classic annuity calculation.
  2. Enter the payment each period. Set it to zero if you are only growing a lump sum. Because payment frequency and compounding frequency are the same field, the formula stays exact rather than approximating a mismatch between them.
  3. Enter the annual rate and the number of years. The rate is nominal and annual; the calculator divides it by the frequency to get the periodic rate. A long horizon is where this tool earns its keep, because the growth term dominates everything else after about fifteen years.
  4. Choose the payment timing. End of period is the ordinary annuity convention and the safer default. Start of period — an annuity due — gives every payment one extra period of growth, and the fourth tile shows exactly what that is worth on your numbers.
  5. Read the split. The donut separates the original lump sum, the payments you made, and the growth on top. The third slice is the only one that is not your own money.

The yearly table is computed period by period rather than from the closed formula, which means the final row and the headline agree exactly. If they ever disagreed, one of them would be wrong, and we would rather find that out than hide it.

Future Value Formula

Two terms added together. The first grows a single sum; the second grows a series of equal payments, each of which has had less time to work than the one before.

FV = PV(1 + i)n + PMT · [((1 + i)n − 1) ÷ i]Annuity due: multiply the second term by (1 + i)Periodic rate i = r ÷ f    Periods n = years × fGrowth = FV − PV − (PMT × n)When i is zero the annuity term divides by zero, so the calculator falls back to PMT × n — the payments with nothing added, which is what a shoebox does.
What each symbol means
SymbolMeaningUnitTypical range
PVPresent value, the amount you have nowcurrency0 – 500,000
PMTPayment made each periodcurrency0 – 5,000
iRate per period0.0005 – 0.02
nTotal number of periodscount12 – 600
FVFuture valuecurrency

It is worth understanding why the second term looks the way it does. The future value of a series is the sum of a geometric progression: the first payment compounds for n − 1 periods, the second for n − 2, and the last for none at all. That sum has a closed form, and the bracketed expression is it.

The annuity-due variant is simpler than it looks. Paying at the start rather than the end shifts every single payment forward by exactly one period, so the whole series is worth (1 + i) times as much. No new formula is needed — just one extra multiplication.

Example

$25,000 today plus $400 a month, 5.5% for twelve years

  1. Periodic rate: 0.055 ÷ 12 = 0.00458333. Periods: 12 × 12 = 144.
  2. Growth factor: 1.00458333144 = 1.931877.
  3. Lump sum term: 25,000 × 1.931877 = $48,296.93.
  4. Annuity term: 400 × ((1.931877 − 1) ÷ 0.00458333) = 400 × 203.3186 = $81,327.45.
  5. Future value: 48,296.93 + 81,327.45 = $129,624.38.
  6. You paid in 25,000 + (400 × 144) = $82,600, so $47,024.38 is growth.

What the timing convention is worth

Switch the same inputs to start-of-period payments and the future value becomes $129,997.13 — a difference of $372.75, or about 0.29%. That is one extra period of growth on every one of the 144 payments, and it is exactly (1 + i) times the annuity term. Small, but free: if your provider lets you pay on the first of the month rather than the last, take it.

Now remove the lump sum and run only the payments: $400 a month for twelve years at 5.5% reaches $81,327.45 from $57,600 of contributions. Remove the payments instead and the $25,000 alone reaches $48,296.93. Neither half tells the whole story, which is why the tool computes both and adds them.

Which Input Moves the Answer Most

The most useful thing to do with a future value calculation is to run it several times and watch which input moves the answer most. On the worked example, here is what each change is worth.

One change at a time, from the $129,624 baseline
ChangeNew future valueDifference
Rate 5.5% → 6.5%$141,331+$11,706
Payment $400 → $450$139,790+$10,166
Term 12 → 14 years$154,784+$25,160
Timing end → start$129,997+$373

Time wins, and it usually wins by a wide margin. Two extra years add more than a full percentage point of return or a 12.5% increase in contributions. That ranking holds across almost every realistic set of inputs, and it is the single most actionable thing a future value calculation tells you.

The second reading worth taking is the growth share. In this example, growth is $47,024 of a $129,624 total — 36.3%. Extend the same plan to twenty-five years and growth becomes more than half the balance. The crossover point, where the account has contributed more than you have, is a genuinely useful milestone to know the date of.

Finally, treat the headline as a nominal figure. $129,624 in twelve years, with 2.5% inflation, has the buying power of about $96,400 today. Running the projection at a real rate — nominal minus inflation — gives you a number in units you can actually picture, and the inflation calculator makes the conversion in one step.

The Four Assumptions Inside the Number

Four assumptions sit inside every future value figure, and each one is worth testing before you rely on the result.

The rate never changes. A constant 5.5% is a modelling convenience. Real returns arrive as a sequence of very different years, and while the ending balance for a pure accumulation is not affected by their order, your willingness to keep going very much is. Run the calculation at a lower rate as well, and treat the pessimistic figure as the plan.

Every payment is made. Missing six months of $400 in year two costs roughly $4,300 by year twelve — the payments themselves plus the growth they would have earned. Consistency is worth more than size, which is why automating a smaller amount usually beats intending to save a larger one.

Nothing is withdrawn and nothing is taxed. If the account is taxable, enter an after-tax rate. If you expect to take money out, this is the wrong tool — future value assumes a one-way flow.

Fees are excluded unless you subtract them. A 0.5% annual platform charge on this plan costs about $5,400 of the final balance. Enter 5.0% instead of 5.5% and the figure becomes honest.

Two related tools finish the picture. The present value calculator runs the same arithmetic backwards, turning a future sum into what it is worth today — which is the right tool when someone offers you a payout later rather than now. And the compound interest calculator covers the same ground with the emphasis on the interest rather than the endpoint, including a compounding-frequency comparison this page deliberately keeps simple.

Frequently Asked Questions

The amount a sum of money, a stream of payments, or both together will be worth at a chosen date given an assumed rate of return. It is the forward-looking half of the time value of money; discounting a future amount back to today is the backward half, and the two use the same equation rearranged.

FV = PV(1 + i)n + PMT · [((1 + i)n − 1) ÷ i], where i is the rate per period and n is the number of periods. The first term grows the lump sum, the second grows the payment stream. Multiply the second term by (1 + i) if payments are made at the start of each period.

Timing. An ordinary annuity pays at the end of each period; an annuity due pays at the start. Because every payment in an annuity due gets one extra period of growth, it is worth exactly (1 + i) times as much. On the worked example that difference is $372.75 over twelve years.

They do here, deliberately. Mismatching them — monthly payments into an account compounding quarterly, say — requires converting one rate into an equivalent for the other frequency, and the approximations people use for that are a common source of small errors. Keeping them aligned makes the published formula exact.

Subtract your inflation assumption from the rate. A 5.5% nominal return with 2.5% inflation is about 3% real, and the resulting future value is expressed in today's buying power. That is usually the more meaningful figure for anything more than five years out.

Yes, by working backwards. Adjust the payment until the future value matches your target, or use the present value calculator to find what a lump sum today would need to be. Both approaches converge on the same plan from opposite directions.

Usually a sign convention. Spreadsheet FV functions treat payments as outflows and return a negative number, and some default to annuity-due timing. Check the type argument and the sign before assuming either result is wrong.

No. Enter an after-tax rate if the account is taxable: multiply the gross rate by one minus your marginal rate on that income. In a tax-sheltered account you can use the gross rate directly, which is a large part of why such accounts are worth filling first.

Something you would defend to a sceptic, after fees. The useful discipline is to run the calculation twice — once at your expected rate and once two percentage points lower — and build the plan around the lower answer. If it only works at the optimistic rate, it is not a plan.

They are the same mathematics with different emphasis. Compound interest focuses on the interest earned; future value focuses on the ending balance and handles payment streams and timing conventions explicitly. Use whichever framing matches the question you are asking.